The Americanist Dinner Forum is a flagship intellectual event for the AMCS community. Each month AMCS features a new speaker or speakers, exploring a topic relevant to American Culture Studies through different mediums, including formal lectures, roundtables and panels, and informal workshops with a selected reading or other materials.
The Gerry and Bob Virgil Ethic of Service Award recognizes a select group of individuals from the WashU community who show exemplary commitment to service and engagement within the St. Louis area.
The Gerry and Bob Virgil Ethic of Service Award recognizes a select group of individuals from the WashU community who show exemplary commitment to service and engagement within the St. Louis area.
Read moreJay Buchanan received the Spectrum Office’s Gloria Anzaldua Advocacy at Intersections Award on March 20th, and he presented with his award at the ceremony.
This discussion engaged Bob Hansman's book in the Images of America series, Pruitt-Igoe, an innovative photo essay focused on a central site of mid-20th-century African American and American life, death, and creative struggle. The book features a host of never-before-seen images of everyday existence at Pruitt-Igoe. Through these images, it narrates a complex history, and more important, it attempts to do justice to its historical subjects, members of our community, for whom the past is not dead, it's not even past. Along with comments from Bob Hansman (Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts), the discussion featured responses from Douglas Flowe (History), Margaret Garb (History), and Patricia Heyda (Sam Fox School of Design & Visual Arts). The panel discussed the process of creating a historical photo essay, the "politics" of writing the book, and questions of "who owns history."
This panel is a Centennial event commemorated the 1917 massacre in East St. Louis. We looked at the history of this program, as one notable historian has called the event, which occurred over several months and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of black residents in the city. While exploring the galvanizing social and political factors that surrounded the violence, this panel also considered its significances for the racial landscape of the city and the region, explores active struggles to remember the massacre in artistic and cultural projects and work, and examined vital connections to racial issues that define the current moment.
As the field of Latinx Studies continued to evolve, diversify, and grow across the United States, important emergences were happening at Washington University to develop initiatives in this area. This panel brought together members of the Latinx Studies community at Wash U to discuss national trends and local activities, the crucial importance of Latinx Studies for our intellectual community, and the ways in which the field speaks critically to topical issues across the contemporary political and social landscape. The also explored linkages and connections between Latinx Studies and American Culture Studies.
What we wear says a lot about who we are, the articulation of complex identities, and the framing of diverse forms of embodiment and style. This panel explored the cultural politics of clothing and fashion, and especially the racial elements involved in how the adornment of bodies speaks to issues of power and resistance. Panelists brought a range of interests to the table, including thinking critically about the fashion industry, involvement in fashion design and artistic work, and engaged with crucial questions about how clothing factors into the historical and contemporary racial politics of America.
As “materiality” has become a key topic in the humanities and social sciences, this panel attended to the meaning and force of material forms—objects, artifacts, archives, structures—in historical processes and cultural dynamics and dynamics of power and inequality. It examined and provoked discussion of how scholars are grappling with new and exciting questions about material culture, environments, media, bodies, and politics and the materialities (and absences and erasures) that structure archives, landscapes, and worlds.
Born and raised in St. Louis, Alison Rollins is an acclaimed educator, librarian, and poet. Her poetry explores issues of race, culture, and identity, including the city’s racial landscape, and has won numerous awards, including the 2016 Ruth Lilly and Dorothy Sargent Rosenberg Poetry Fellowship from the Poetry Foundation, and second prizewinner of the 2016 James H. Nash Poetry contest. Her poems have appeared in American Poetry Review, Hayden’s Ferry Review, Meridian, Missouri Review, The Offing, Poetry, The Poetry Review, River Styx, Solstice, Tupelo Quarterly, and Vinyl. For this forum, Rollins presented and discussed poems on historical understandings of memory and issues of trauma, materiality, bodies, and race. The forum discussant, Aaron Coleman, a PhD student in the Comparative Literature Program's Track for International Writers at Washington University, is the author of the chapbook, St. Trigger, which won the 2015 Button Poetry Prize, and a full-length collection, Threat Come Close. His poetry has won many awards and appeared in Boston Review, Fence, and New York Times Magazine.
Di Wang, an AMCS graduate Harvey Fellow in Comparative Literature, focused a discussion around a set of newspaper articles written by H.L. Mencken: "America Produces a Novelist" (1916), "Mark Twain's Americanism" (1917), "The American" (1918), "Star-Spangled Men" (1920), and "The Land of the Free" (1921). These pieces reflect Mencken's unique brand of wit and satire, and speak as much to the politics of satire in his age as contemporary expressions of satire in a "post fact" world, as seen in satirical comedy shows on television.
Megan Steigerwald Ille, American Culture Studies Postdoctoral Fellow in Digital Cultures, presented her research on new developments in opera in the United States. Performed in limousines, under bridges, and on top of buildings across L.A and transmitted by audience members via livestream, The Industry's opera Hopscotch (2015) challenges conventions of operatic spectatorship and place. Although reviewers of the opera positioned works like Hopscotch as a panacea to bourgeois stereotypes of the operatic genre—a move out of the inaccessible house and into the space of the street—these works are far from utopian for all spectators. In fact, anti-gentrification protests organized by Serve the People LA (STPLA) in Hollenbeck Park disrupted multiple performances of Hopscotch. While director Yuval Sharon deliberately staged the Hollenbeck Park scene in a way that was meant to reflect the surrounding neighborhood, some onlookers interpreted this choice as a sign of neocolonialist appropriation and aggression. The protests reveal that for some, alternative works are mediated not only by genre, technology, and place, but also by whiteness, class, and questions of access. Steigerwald Ille discussed conflicting interpretations of the Hollenbeck Park performances and notions of gentrification, mobility, and the experience economy more broadly.
Dr. Pliley led a discussion focused on an original document from the FBI archives relating to investigations of alleged sex work in New York City in the 1930s.
Throughout much of the twentieth century, company-sponsored athletic programs were central to the landscape of American sports. Conceived as mechanisms for labor discipline and company loyalty as well as positive public relations, industrial sports figured prominently in workplaces and communities across the United States. This talk by Dan Gilbert, a historian of sports from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, examines a particularly robust and revealing case study in the development of American industrial sports—the athletic programs of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, based in Akron, Ohio.
Frank Guridy, a professor of history at Columbia University, presented work that examines the continuities in black athletic activism from the 1960s until the present. Drawing from his research on sport and black communities in California, he illustrated how black athletes and spectators have made sporting spaces, such as stadiums, their own, even when they were designed for other purposes. In this way, the presentation highlighted the centrality of sport to African American community formation. The presentation also explored the possibilities and limits of visual sources, especially videos posted on YouTube, for historical research.
This forum focused on timely issues related to incarceration and justice, including voting rights and prison education projects. The panelists also discussed different methods for conducting research and activism within prisons. The panelists were Karishma Furtado (Brown School of Social Work), Aaron Griffith (John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics), and Cyrus O'Brien (John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics).
This forum explored contemporary and historical perspectives on immigration, borders, transnationalism, American power, mass media, and racialized and gendered valences of authoritarian politics across the United States and Latin America. The guest was John Patrick Leary, a professor of English at Wayne State University, and the discussant was Sunita Parikh (Political Science).
A roundtable with Lisa Lowe, Samuel Knight Professor of American Studies at Yale University, in conversation with Adrienne Davis (Law), Ignacio Sanchez-Prado (Romance Languages), and Ariela Schacter (Sociology). As the Trump administration constructs immigration as a state of emergency and violently shapes the lives of thousands of migrants, it is easy to limit our attention to these urgent political concerns. But the focus on migrant children and families and the U.S.-Mexico border can obscure the bigger picture of longer unfolding and broader crises of migration that affect multiple racial groups and link the U.S. with many regions of the world. This roundtable contextualized the Trump era crisis in global, multi-racial, and historical perspectives, placing it within the systems of state policy, citizenship, empire, and global capital of which it has been a part.
Objects enable the social world to happen, and we need to pay attention to what objects do and how they work, observed the historian David Jaffee. Religion and politics are undeniably central to the social world of early America, and objects enabled the happening of religious and political cultures in terms of their theory, practice, and imagination. A day-long panel series explored these three components of early American material culture—theory, practice, and imagination. And the discussion culminated in the American Forum, bringing together an interdisciplinary group of scholars from across the country who specialize in religious studies, literature, art history, history, and American studies to discuss how attending to the material elucidates new facets of early American politics and religion. The discussant facilitators were Phillip Maciak (Film and Media Studies) and Caroline Wigginton, Assistant Professor of English at the University of Mississippi.